Scoring methodology
Transparent, rule-based composite of six AML skills. No ML; every factor is deterministic and citable.
Dimension weights
25%
20%
15%
15%
15%
10%
- Sanctions Screening25%
- Country Risk Scoring20%
- High-Risk Jurisdiction Monitoring15%
- Sanctions Circumvention Risk15%
- PEP & Adverse Media15%
- Country Context Enrichment10%
Composite score = Σ (dimension score × weight) ÷ Σ weights. All dimension scores and factor scores are on 0–100.
Risk levels
Low
0 – 24
Medium
25 – 49
High
50 – 69
Critical
70 – 100
Factors by dimension
Sanctions Screening
25%- Direct Sanctions Hit (HQ listed on OFAC/UN/EU/FATF blacklist)60%
- UBO Sanctions Exposure30%
- Fuzzy Watchlist Similarity10%
Country Risk Scoring
20%- HQ FATF Status40%
- Basel AML Index of HQ30%
- HQ CPI (inverse)30%
High-Risk Jurisdiction Monitoring
15%- High-Risk Operating Footprint40%
- Subsidiaries in Sanctioned Jurisdictions40%
- Recent High-Risk Expansion20%
Sanctions Circumvention Risk
15%- Transit Hub + Sanctioned Co-occurrence50%
- Sanctioned-Neighbor Exposure30%
- Opaque Ownership Chain20%
PEP & Adverse Media
15%- UBO PEP Status50%
- Adverse Media Count30%
- Regulatory Enforcement History20%
Country Context Enrichment
10%- WGI Control of Corruption50%
- Rule of Law Environment30%
- Financial Secrecy20%